
I read an article, Brain-Based Leading… today… in Notre Dame Business
Magazine, where Elizabeth Station wrote…”Some years ago, a prominent politician delighted “C” students at Yale with the assertion that “you, too, can be President of the .” He wasn’t the first to suggest that traditional measures of intelligence don’t always predict leadership success.”
What a brilliant reminder that intelligence is not fixed and fate is not set against your success…. So who’s smart and who’s not? Thanks
Elizabeth Station showed images for change… from recent research by Management Professor Amy E. Colbert ... which pointed out “the relationship between intelligence and leadership is considerably lower than previously thought.” She added that … “Colbert and two colleagues reviewed 151 independent studies that probed the intelligence-leadership connection, finding only a moderate link between the two.
When others’ perceptions rather than “pencil-and-paper” tools were used to measure intelligence, the authors found a stronger correlation to leadership. In other words, appearing smart may have a greater impact on perceptions of leadership ability than being smart.”
Then Elizabeth Station throws in a ringer question for renewal … “So if brains aren’t paramount, what qualities do matter most?” She then quotes one response from Colbert who said, said: “There’s a constellation of traits that make a leader.”
Wow – what a question to help us to think bigger, to fit the exciting news… that we now know about the brain…. Thanks







» If Brains Aren't Paramount... What Matters Most for Leaders? from BrainBasedBusiness
“Leaders are usually extroverted, conscientious, open and emotionally stable, according to previous research. Intelligence is important when combined with attributes like motivation, persistence and dominance….” That’s accordin... [Read More]
Tracked on: June 23, 2006 8:49 AM | Permalink to Trackback